by Asha
A while ago, my friend asked if I wanted to see Bride and Prejudice – the Indian version of Pride and Prejudice starring Aishwarya Rai (you know, the woman who won Miss World in 1994, and is often called “the most beautiful woman in the world“?) who plays the main character, Lalita Bakshi. I agreed, because it was a movie that I have wanted to see for a while and I am a sucker for all things with a Bollywood twist.
While I did enjoy the film immensely – it combined two of my favorite things in the world, Bollywood and rom-coms, who wouldn’t I? – I did find a couple of aspects of the movie really eye-roll worthy. Which parts? Mainly, the depiction of Mr. Kholi, Lalita’s Indian suitor, and Mrs. Bakshi, Lalita’s mother who insists she marry him because he has money plus he lives in America because they were really typical of characters present when Hollywood decides to make a movie set in India. Even the lyrics of the No Life Without Wife song from the movie illustrate how stereotypical Mr. Kholi is as a suitor :
Lonely Mr. Kholi from Las Angeles
Came to Punjab on one bent knee
He had a green card, new house, big cash
So made a wish with every fallen lash
For you to do the journey with him
To smile when he got home ask how his day had been
He wants you by his side in joy and strife
Poor Mr. Kholi he has no life without wife.
– Lyrics from No Life Without Wife from Bride and Prejudice
Granted, it is an adaptation, so I will let it pass. (I do wonder though, if this modern version of the novel would have worked in a different country that was not India? Would Hollywood have tried to make the same format work in, say, modern day England?)
However, characters like Mr. Kholi and Mrs. Bakshi are not single instances in Hollywood. They are part of a collection of Indian characters that are more or less depicted the same way – I couldn’t help but be reminded of 2002 British film Bend It Like Beckham starring Parminder Nagra and Keira Knightly. Nagra’s character faces essentially the same struggles as Rai’s character, in that she wants to lead her own life and follow her own dreams, but is held by her traditional and commanding mother, who just wants what she thinks is best for her daughters.
Movie poster for Bend It Like Beckham, a film about a Punjabi girl who struggles with being part of two vastly different cultures and following her dreams or appeasing her family
I have to wonder where this idea that all Indian girls, especially ones in the diaspora, face the same problems and are someway oppressed by their culture comes from. Is it Bollywood? I mean, Bollywood does have a serious epidemic of objectifying its female characters and treating them as simple plot devices – something that has spread into the South Indian film industries as well. Some have noted that Bollywood essentially has only four main roles for its women – the Ideal Wife, the Ideal Mother, the Vamp, and the Courtesan – something I find to be a gross simplification of the Indian film industry in general. There are several noteworthy female centric females – some of which that have come out as recently as a few years ago.
For example, there is a 2009 Telugu film starring Anushka Shetty and Sonu Sood called Arundhati, where the main character not only kicks the villain’s arse twice but saves the guy for once instead. The film was popular in its native state of Andhra Pradesh and Shetty also went on to do a film called Vedam where she plays a prostitute that actually gets a complete character arc and development.
So, there is definitely some progress when it comes to portraying real Indian women in the Indian film industry. Some of the most acclaimed movies in Bollywood are the female-centric ones and there is a definitely a revolution occurring in India among the younger generation – both in the film industry and outside – to dismantle the traditional image of what is means to be a woman – a revolution that Western portrayals of India continue to fail to mention.
Take for instance the hit movie Slumdog Millionaire, about a boy (Jamal Malik) played by Dev Patel and his life trying to survive in the slums of India and reunite with his childhood love.
First, the movie is not a completely accurate portrayl of India – the progressive side of India is completely ignored in order to paint an image of India that is dirt poor, infested with crime with a complete lack of compassion from the police. But it also undermines and underrepresents Indian women. There are only two prominent female characters in the movie – Jamal’s mother and his love interest Latika, played by Frieda Pinto.
Yes, India has regressive elements that result in rapes, female feticides and a gender bias. But India is also a country where women choose to wear and say what they want. It has Indira Gandhi, Indra Nooyi and Medha Patkar. And yes, we also have space for Mallika Sherawat. It is uncool for an Indian woman to go abroad and speak ill of our country. We have problems, yes. But we are fighting them. And we will defeat them. – Richa Chadha
Jamal’s mother is killed off pretty early in the narrative – really, we only see her berating and beating her sons for skipping school and then later telling them to run just before being killed herself. She reinforces and amplifies the role of “the mother” that Bollywood has, but to western audiences, she is an Indian mother, the stereotypical one that beats her kids as her way of showing affection and teaching them a lesson – as if all Indian mothers are homogenous entities that beat their kids but still love them unconditionally.
Latika is another stereotype of Indian female characters – her whole life is basically dominated by men making the choices for her. The only time she makes her own choices is when it concerns Jamal. She basically paints an image that all Indian women are essentially controlled by the men in their lives and have no say when it comes to living how they want.
Latika and Jamal’s mother are not single instances either when it comes to characters in western movies about India – Asha from Outsourced, the girl from the ashram in Eat, Pray, Love, and more recently, the mother in Life of Pi. The former two are forced into an arranged marriage that they don’t particularly want by their parents, which is a complete misrepresentation of how modern day arranged marriages actually work in India (it is more like a dating game, where the parents choose matches for their sons/daughters who then get to decide who they like best) and the later who also ends up killed off, but not before imparting crucial wisdom and insight in the titular character Pi. Not to mention, how similar all the Indian females on TV here in the U.S. are as well.
So, what’s up Hollywood? Why are your Indian female characters basically the same? Do we really come up as that oppressed and homogenous? Because, I can assure you, we are not.